"POLITICS OF HYPOCRISY BY THE KASHMIRI'S".
The instrument of accession is a legal document which was executed by Maharaja Hari Singh, ruler of J&K on 26 Oct 1947. by executing this document under the provision of the Indian Independence Act 1947, Maharaja Hari Singh agreed to accede to the Dominion of India .
During that time there was no mention/clause of any Constitutional Provision, giving Special Status to the State of J&K by India. The highly objectionable Article 35 A, discriminating other Indians of equal Rights in J&K was introduced by Nehru, maliciously; without Parliament discussion and approval, but by directly getting President of India Ordinance, for implementing it illegally in the State of J&K.
This Article was added in The Constitution of India after seven years of accession of J&K, in 1954. A total Anti-India move by Nehru.
Now a PIL as filed, had come up for hearing today( 06 Aug 18). apart from many citizens of J&K as Petitioner's, large number of Muslims and J&K Muslim women are also Petitioner's; demanding abolishment of this controversial Article 35 A, which violates the Fundamental Rights of other Indians.
This Article was added in The Constitution of India after seven years of accession of J&K, in 1954. A total Anti-India move by Nehru.
Now a PIL as filed, had come up for hearing today( 06 Aug 18). apart from many citizens of J&K as Petitioner's, large number of Muslims and J&K Muslim women are also Petitioner's; demanding abolishment of this controversial Article 35 A, which violates the Fundamental Rights of other Indians.
The surprising development of the entire embroilment are the Separatist, who till yesterday did not believe in the Indian Constitution,The Indian Supreme Court and the Indian Nation have called for J&K Band; against Abolition of Article 35 A, without realizing, they are endorsing and agreeing that the entire J&K is rightfully a legal part of India.
The matter has now been differed and adjourned for hearing by the Supreme Court on 27 Aug. The SC on that day would decide the Constitutional validity of the case. The need to refer this matter to a Five Judge Constitutional Bench; Or to decide the case by the present Three Judge Bench.
A smart and well orchestrated move of Politics.
No comments:
Post a Comment